RE: [Epic] Land Raiders

From: Kelley, Kevin J., JCS <kevin.kelley_at_...>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 07:22:02 -0400

> That
> > leaves, at most, 21 Land Raiders per company. Now, when creating a
> > Space
> > Marine force, do you really think that you would risk half of your
> > supply
> > of your best tanks in ONE battle?
Like the Gemans and their new bestest tanks at Kursk???

> ----------
> From: Mike Looney - ionet[SMTP:mlooney_at_...]
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 1998 3:16 PM
> To: space-marine_at_...
> Subject: Re: [Epic] Land Raiders
>
> The Forgotten Spice Girl wrote:
>
> > Ok, this is just getting gross. I'm getting really tired of the LR
> > are
> > cheesy argument. Please, stop the whining and look, for a moment, at
> > the
> > Space Marine army list. I know that the makers intended a mixed SM/IG
> >
> > army when they created that list, but unlike most players I think they
> >
> > were mature enough to create balanced detatchments that reflect the
> > relative rarity of Land Raiders. If you read the codices for 40K,
> > only
> > the 1st company and captains of other companies would have acces.
> > That
> > leaves, at most, 21 Land Raiders per company. Now, when creating a
> > Space
> > Marine force, do you really think that you would risk half of your
> > supply
> > of your best tanks in ONE battle?
> >
>
> 1) The C:UM says there are "Whole Companies of Land Raiders". I will
> post the exact wording when I get back to the house.2) Epic fluff, vs
> WH40K fluff has NEVER claimed that Land Raiders are rare.
>
>
> --
> Sillyness is the last refuse of the doomed. P. Opus
> http://www.spellbooksoftware.com
> --
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.1
> GAT d-- s:- a38 US++ P+ L+ E W+++ N++ K++ w++ O- M- V-- PS+ PE++ Y PGP
> t++
> 5 X R+++ tv+ b++++ DI+++ D G+ e+ h--- r+++ y+++(**)
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
>
>
Received on Tue Jul 14 1998 - 11:22:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:44 UTC