Re: [Epic] Re:

From: Oki Purwanto <oki_at_...>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:12:29 +0800

At 09:50 PM 7/15/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Gee...a report like that makes me want to buy one today! (NOT!!!!)
>As a friend of Clay and myself said over the phone yesterday (Al Pare).."GW
>markets concepts...." I guess the damned thing doesn't have to fit to be
>more than a "concept".
>I'll stick with "home brewed" terrain.
>Later.
>Steve M.
>

I think all our messages on this thread goes to all GW games list. Something
that I did not know until I saw my reply on WH40K list. Should have been
more careful with that reply all button :)

Regards
Oki



>----------
>> From: Jimi Tubman <jimi_at_...>
>> To: Epic Mailing List <space-marine_at_...>; WAB Mailing List
><whancients_at_...>; WFB Mailing List <warhammerfb@...>; 40K
>Mailing List <40k-list_at_...>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Wednesday, July 15, 1998 2:52 PM
>>
>> [Warhammer Ancient Battles Mailing List]
>>
>> Just seen the new GW Castle at the GW Newcastle store.
>>
>> 75UKP for a second-rate kit that would have Airfix/Revell/Tamiya/etc
>> reaching for the nearest sick bucket!!
>>
>> The castle is multi-part and comes complete with four towers, three walls
>> and a gate wall.
>>
>> The castle that I saw had terribly fitting parts ie the front of the wall
>> didnt fit the walkway, leaving a small gap all the way round.
>>
>> It may have been the way it was put together but it looked rotten!!
>>
>> The GW staff mentioned that the individual castle pieces are to be sold
>> seperately.
>>
>> The manager was saying that it was the best kit GW ever made and well
>worth
>> the price - obviously he never saw/had the original GW Mighty Fortress!!
>>
>> I still have my Mighty Fortress - untouched by human hand (ie not
>painted)
>> and still in its original GW box.
>>
>> NO!! I wont sell it!! I may be daft looking but I aint stupid!! :P
>>
>>
>> Jimi :)
>>
>> "Discussion is an exchange of knowledge; argument an exchange of
>ignorance."
>>
>
Received on Thu Jul 16 1998 - 05:12:29 UTC