Greg Lane wrote:
>
> There is no official errata to this effect. Jervis has said that they
> understand the problem and their method is to use the rules as written ...
> however he stated that folks might want to have a 'house rule' to give
> this, as well ... if you have 1 to 0 FP then you get +1, but must have at
> least 4 FP to 0 to get +4 ... effectivelyu this says ... treat a total of
> 0 FP as 1 FP ... not 1 FP per unit, just 1 FP for the total detachment to
> avoid the dividing by zero problem. It works, makes sense (like snap
> fire), and meets a reasonability test, as well.
I perfectly agree , that's how we play up to now .
Thx
Needle
Received on Sun Aug 30 1998 - 13:17:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:48 UTC