Re: [Epic] "FIREPOWER" and Blast Markers

From: J Andrew Evans <m00ebg00_at_...>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 19:20:52 +0100

My point is to do with the words "Super-heavy weapon shots" as opposed to "Super
heavy weapons." If one BM closes down one super-heavy weapon shot then a SHW
with 3xAT needs 3 BMs.

Isn't this clear?

A#

Andy Skinner wrote:

> > Epic Rulebook Errata in Firepower.
> > page 31: Extra text added to the end of para 4:
> > "Each blast marker on a detachment reduces its super heavy weapon shots
> > or firepower by one each. The detachment's firepower is always reduced
> > first, and if the blast markers exceed its firepower the remainders are
> > deducted from its super-heavy weapon shots."
>
> I don't think so--that's how we've understood SHWs and BMs for a while,
> since Q&A here. I think the question is whether it is one SHW with the
> effect of 3xAT or 3 AT SHWs. The name/model might give clues, but having it
> listed as 3xAT doesn't clear it up, since I think that's the same as for
> Land Raider guns.
>
> Thanks for posting about Firepower contents.
>
> As a continuing forum, do you mean this is supposed to be a new regular
> publication, dedicated to Epic?
>
> andy
Received on Wed Sep 09 1998 - 18:20:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:51 UTC