Re: [Epic] "FIREPOWER" and Blast Markers

From: J Andrew Evans <m00ebg00_at_...>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 22:51:37 +0100

Greg said:

>.YES! Now, is there any other information to support or deny the question
> of whether you can deduct from the FP whether it is in range or not?

No. I quoted the whole thing.

Main point of article seems to be to deal with apparent difficulties with
super-heavy tanks. There is a new Critical damage table so they don't get
wasted so quickly and WEs get a set of special orders (!) they can use.

OVERWATCH
MARCH
ASSAULT
FLAK

This is beginning to sound like SM/TL.

A#

Greg Lane wrote:

>
>

> > Epic Rulebook
> > page 31: Extra text added to the end of para 4:
> > "Each blast marker on a detachment reduces its super heavy weapon shots
> > or firepower by one each. The detachment's firepower is always reduced
> > first, and if the blast markers exceed its firepower the remainders are
> > deducted from its super-heavy weapon shots."
> >
> > I think this reverses the consensus we were coming to over Blast markers
> > affecting weapons not shots and means the 3xAT weapon needs three BMs to
> > shut it down.
> >
> > A#
Received on Wed Sep 09 1998 - 21:51:37 UTC