Re: [Epic] different scales

From: Earl Hansen <hansene_at_...>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 21:36:35 +0200

Who publishes Command Decision 3rd edition?

                    Earl

Galleo_at_... wrote:

> <The whole problem is that GW should be called FW or MW where F stands
> <for Figure or M is Miniature. While E40K comes close to being a real
> <set of war games rules, it still has some problems, the 1:1.5:3 ratio of
> <small arms:tanks:artillery range being the one of biggest.
> <
> <Command Decision 3rd edition is out now. I am giving very strong
> <thoughts to doing army lists and weapons charts for the major WH40K/Epic
> <races. Just as a test how many list members would like to see this?
> <Or for that matter have CD3?
>
> Not I. Although I like Command Decision I for one cannot see why one would
> want to use that system with E40K. For me E40K is a fun set of rules to play
> when I'm not playing DBM which is an ancients rules set and I like it that
> way. Also from what I've read of the 40K Universe I seriously doubt that Orks
> and Tyranids have armies remotely close to the detailed OBs that are done for
> CD. Eldar and Chaos maybe. SM likely. IG probably. CD is much to complex a
> rules set to use for gothic scifi. But that's just my opinion.
>
> John
Received on Tue Sep 15 1998 - 19:36:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:52 UTC