Re: [Epic] Re: OT Fantasy wargaming
David A Leduke wrote:
> > Tzeenecht_at_... wrote:
> >
> > > In a message dated 98-09-14 19:54:36 EDT, you write:
> > >
> > > << I'll send a working copy of the rules to anyone who can think of a
> > > decent name for it: it's been Tactical Fantasy Battles, Ultimate Fantasy
> > > and Fantasy Warlords so far.
> > >
>
> How about Ancient Battles, or ( Ilike this one better) Ancient
> Warlords. Ancient conveys the fact that it is not a modern or sci fi
> game and also could be of a magical nature. All without using the word
> "fantasy" too many images there especially ones with too much magic.
> Battles and warlords conveys the scale, at least they do to me. If
> these names are deemed worthy I would greatly appreciate a copy of your
> rule, if not I'll probably just buy them.
>
> D
The problem with "ancient " is it conveys a whole different genre of game; the
historicals with Rome vs. Carthage, Egypt vs. Babylonian, etc.
I really appreciate all of the help I'm getting with this
Thane
Received on Wed Sep 16 1998 - 02:33:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:52 UTC