Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...)

From: Spatula <shupes_at_...>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 10:35:35 -0500

> From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
>
> I don't know Chad, I issued the challenge "you don't need to defend titans",
> and what I have so far is four (count 'em - 4!) replies suggesting that
> while it is a valid interpretation, "we're sure that's not what GW meant",
> one reply of "no I haven't checked the rules 'cause whether it says that or
> not I'll continue to insist that we do it MY way" and a suggestion that I
> "drop the subject for pity's sake"...

        Well you were gettin kinda pushy about it... =) It seems pretty clear
to me that your proposed interpretation is not what GW intended, especially
considering it doesn't make much sense logically. Non-skimmers can only
hurt the titan if they touch it's feet... but they can never get there since
they'll be pinned at the base... so why even say the bit about the feet
if they can never get there?

> You CAN get sound tactical advice from this list, but I am disapointed by
> the lack of rules clarification. When I found the list (six month's ago?) I
> thought "great - now I can find out other people interpret whatever my
> gaming crowd is argueing about at the moment".

        But of course our interpretations are no more valid than anyone else's...

> When NetEPIC started I thought "great, now we can fix all of those glaring
> problems with EPIC..."
>
> Sadly, only a tiny few of us are prepared to help out folks who know less
> about the rules than we do.

        There are people who know less than we do??? I don't believe it. =)

Scott
shupes_at_...
Received on Wed Mar 05 1997 - 15:35:35 UTC