Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...)

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 13:25:55 GMT

At 05:13 PM 5/3/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Excerpts from Epic: 5-Mar-97 Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a.. by Brett
>Hollindale_at_powerup
>> > It seems pretty clear
>> >to me that your proposed interpretation is not what GW intended, especially
>> >considering it doesn't make much sense logically. Non-skimmers can only
>> >hurt the titan if they touch it's feet... but they can never get there since
>> >they'll be pinned at the base... so why even say the bit about the feet
>> >if they can never get there?
>> >
>>
>>
>> You can get there IF THE TITAN IS PINNED...
>>
>> (Which part doesn't make sense logically?)
>
> Now I'm really confused. Where does it say you are pinned at the
>base? (I never understood this part myself. I haven't really
>contributed to the discussion because you never stated a valid reasoning
>for this critical part of your interpretation).
>
> Now, assuming I buy your argument for the first part, you're now
>claiming that if the Titan is pinned, dogfaces are no longer pinned at
>the base but are now pinned at the feet?
>
>So, you're saying
>
>1) non-skimming, non-Titan units are pinned at the base.
>
>2) If something pins the Titan, non-skimming, non-Titan units are not
>pinned by the Titan
>
>???
>
>I don't believe that either point is true. If you're pinned, it means
>that CC will be involved. I'd like to hear a reasoned argument for both
>points if you want me to believe the new theory. Otherwise, I see no
>reason the old method of CC is invalidated.
>
>Mark
>

I'll get back to you with a detailed message tomorrow (it's almost midnight
and definitely too late for me...)

Agro
Received on Thu Mar 06 1997 - 13:25:55 UTC