Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...)
At 10:25 AM 7/3/97 -0800, you (Tony) wrote:
>Wow, what can I say but you are one stubborn individual.
I prefer "driven" or "righteous" or "determined", but I understand where
you're comin' from...
>However, there have been way too many posts on this circular logic of the
rules.
>I would say that it is accounting for most of the "discussion" on the
>list.
That's true. And I thank people for their opinions (I did ask for them
after all...)
>It is also going nowhere.
It WAS going nowhere. (It may still be...) But since I only made my point
clear enough for rational discussion yesterday, you might cut me a few days
slack on this...
>In lieu of your complaint that the Net Epic thread was taking up too much
bandwidth,
Yes, it is early. you would mean "in view of"....
^^^^
And my "complaint" was about the non EPIC content of netEPIC, not about the
bandwidth...
>I will say the same about this thread. I vote we can it. (yes it is early,
and yes
>I am grumpy).
Like I say, wake up refreshed and give me a couple more days please...
>At least now I know why they call you Agro and not Brett.
Never realised it was connected myself :-)
Agro
Received on Sat Mar 08 1997 - 12:39:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:13 UTC