Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...)

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 12:46:44 GMT

At 11:36 AM 8/3/97 +0800, you wrote:
>At 10:25 AM 3/7/97 -0800, you wrote:
>>Wow, what can I say but you are one stubborn individual. However,
>>there have been way too many posts on this circular logic of the rules.
>>I would say that it is accounting for most of the "discussion" on the
>>list. It is also going nowhere. In lieu of your complaint that the
>>Net Epic thread was taking up too much bandwidth, I will say the same
>>about this thread. I vote we can it. (yes it is early, and yes I am
>>grumpy).
>>
>>At least now I know why they call you Agro and not Brett.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Now that Jervis is back on the 40k list (don't ask me why he is not on the
>Epic list), perhaps we can forward him the situation. I understand that the
>Primarchs have stated before that they have been very busy and someone
>mentioned that with Epic40K the Primarchs decided not to go too much into
>Epic nowadays.
>
>Maybe Alan (you were the official Q&A guy right ?) can send him an e-mail,
>explaining the situation and ask for the original interpretation of those
>sentences. It is driving me nuts !
>
>Also, maybe we can all promised that in exchange of his response, we won't
>bring up the doomweaver-vs-voidshields ever again. And that this will be the
>last Epic question we'll send him, after all Epic40k will be coming in about
>3 weeks time. How about that ?
>
>Regards
>Oki
>
>


Yep, I would be morethan happy to get the only really valid interpretation
on this...

How about it Allen?

Agro
Received on Sat Mar 08 1997 - 12:46:44 UTC