Re: [Epic] Re: your mail

From: Mike Bowen <mbowen_at_...>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 12:40:17 -0500 (CDT)

On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, E. Sund wrote:

>
> I saw someone mention that they were interested in the 1st ed/AD rules.
> Has anyone else been using those rules lately? I was looking over some
> old WDs the other day (109,110,116,117,122) that featured a number of
> articles from Codex Titanticus and they seem very interesting. There's a
> loot of variety for the units. It looks like it might play a little slow,
> though. I do like the idea of paying different points values for
> differently-armed titans. Anybody playing AD still?
>
> E> SUnd
>

I always liked 1st Ed. SM. The points system was a little goofy,but MUCH
better than the 2nd Ed. army cards. I was left out in the rush to 2nd Ed.
Couldn't stand those cards, and nobody wanted to play 1st Ed., so i got
rid of most of my epic stuff. Now with E40k, its simple, but plays fast.
Now looking to get back into epic. <sigh>. More money to GW.

Now if GW would have... Advanced E40k, with a little more detailing,
 I would be really glad..

Mike
Received on Mon Apr 21 1997 - 17:40:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:22 UTC