Re: Daemon cavalry (prev : [Epic] more lost figs)

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: <duckrvr_at_...>
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 20:33:44 -0500

At 05:45 PM 5/15/97 -0400, you wrote:

> Just that +6 for calvary is probably too high, if
>indeed IG can get it for only +2. +4 sounds about right,
>I think.

IG pay +3. 2 stands for 14 vs. 1 stand for 10.
Received on Sat May 17 1997 - 01:33:44 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: duckrvr_at_...: "Re: [Epic] Epic playing groups and off-topic subjects...[LONG]"
Previous message: duckrvr_at_...: "Re: Daemon cavalry (prev : [Epic] more lost figs)"
Maybe in reply to: oki_at_...: "Daemon cavalry (prev : [Epic] more lost figs)"
Next in thread: Scott Shupe: "Re: Daemon cavalry (prev : [Epic] more lost figs)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:28 UTC