Re: [Epic] Firepower vs Anti-Tank

From: <duckrvr_at_...>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 08:54:49 -0500

At 12:06 PM 6/22/97 +1300, you wrote:

>I have to disagree I don't think that Land raiders that susceptable to BMs.
>In my example even in the second round of firing the Land raiders could
>inflict 4.5 kills vs 1 kill for the remaining two Leman Russ

But compared to Leman Russes (what a word), 1 BM strips an AT shot instead
of 1 fp. That's 1/18 of the LR's firepower versus 1/30 for the Leman Russ's.

There's also the fact that you have compared tanks armed to fight tanks with
tanks armed to fight infantry. Obviously, in a duel the AT will win. I bet
if you took infantry armed to fight tanks against infantry armed to kill
infantry, the anit-infantry detachment would win, too.

OTOH, I still think LRs are better . . .

Temp
Received on Mon Jun 23 1997 - 13:54:49 UTC