Re: [Epic] roolzboyz

From: Eugene E.W. <eug_at_...>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:17:16 -0400

----------
From: James Nugent <jnug1453_at_...>
To: 'space-marine_at_...'
Subject: RE: [Epic] roolzboyz
Date: Thursday, July 24, 1997 12:37 PM



1. what effect if any do eldar holofields (which save vs all hits
even
those inflicted in close combat) have vs close combat weapons which
"automatically inflicts catastrophic damage"?
===> What this is inteded to get across is that if you do, in fact, get
hit you take the cata. damage.

No offense to the roolzboyz, but the roolz clearly state that if a war
engine with a close assault weapon wins a close combat against another war
machine, that losing war machine suffers catastrophic damage. It isn't as
if this rule needed clarification to begin with. The holofield saves
against hits, not rolls on the catastrophic damage table, so it won't save
your precious titan against the CLEANSING POWER of the IMPERIAL CHAINFIST.
In my opinion, at least.

                                Regards, Eugene
(who is very fond of his warlord's close assault capabilities)
Received on Thu Jul 24 1997 - 18:17:16 UTC