[NetEpic ML] Re: DISCUSSION POINTS

From: kevin ludwig <sj_khorne_at_...>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:03:51 -0800 (PST)

---Tzeentch <tzeentch666_at_...> wrote:
>
> [HEAVY INFANTRY]
> While everyone agrees that heavy infantry are not cheesy in
themselves,
> armies that have their entire infantry component composed of them
are a bit
> on the cheddar side. This seems to mainly afflict the Space Marines
and
> Imperial Guard.
I would let a whole IG army do as they please because they are mainly
HW anyway . SM i would go i tac or other for every heavy squad
> [ELDAR FREE CARDS]
> Not a big issue I agree but this could be clearly stated.
> A) Leave everything as it is.
>
> [VORTEX MISSILES]
> Are they too powerful for their cost?
> E) Increase their cost, and if so how much? 5-15
>
> [BLAST TEMPLATES]
> This needs to be cleared up, as people seem to be interpreting this
> different ways. Pick and choose from the below possibilities.
> B) Artillery detachments using the "open sheaf" rules may divide
their BPs
> over any number of templates up to the number of firing units. These
> templates may not overlap.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/netepic
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Received on Sun Mar 14 1999 - 03:03:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:44 UTC