[NetEpic ML] Re: DISCUSSION POINTS

From: Justin Ho <jhh14_at_...>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:10:49 -0500

At 07:03 PM 3/13/99 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>---Tzeentch <tzeentch666_at_...> wrote:
>>
>> [HEAVY INFANTRY]
>> While everyone agrees that heavy infantry are not cheesy in
>themselves,
>> armies that have their entire infantry component composed of them
>are a bit
>> on the cheddar side. This seems to mainly afflict the Space Marines
>and
>> Imperial Guard.
>I would let a whole IG army do as they please because they are mainly
>HW anyway . SM i would go i tac or other for every heavy squad

  Then what's the point of Tac companies? The IG is victory by weight of
numbers and individual guardsmen are meant to be cannon fodder, but I
personally at least have never seen any other infantry in IG armies except
the heavy companies. Something can't be entirely right when the special
infantry always outnumber the supposedly more common Tactical squads.

   Justin


------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/netepic
Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com
Received on Sun Mar 14 1999 - 05:10:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:44 UTC