Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Dark eldar revision part 1 (long)

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:51:04 -0400

Hi!

While I dont mind special rules and such, I am very loathe to give an
infantry stand this ability of needing -1 weapons. While many units have
kick ass abilities they still may be slain with regular fire with no
modifiers. Of course you can always test it, but remember that such a
unit is immune to fire UNLESS there is a unit capable of -1 fire close
by. Given the right circumstances this could be extremely unbalancing.

By the way people please trim the post this one is getting too long and
consuming too much byte space.

Peter

Trygve Bj�rnstad wrote:

> Quite true, but to take Nils' side for a second... Introducing the -1 TSM
> requirement for this special card is no worse then our g(r)ay knights with
> their teleportation ability. The only problem I can see is that we become
> tempted to add this bonus to other, new units as well...
>
> Trygve
Received on Thu Aug 16 2001 - 12:51:04 UTC