Hi!
I don't either, but neither will I stifle creative urges. It might be fun to
use in a scenario or two, but its purely optional ( even more so than
usual).
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas
> I don't fancy that idea, the epic games are large scale conflicts, a
single
> individual would not make much of a difference!
>
> Nils
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karlsen, Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> Sent: 1. november 2001 15:05
> To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> Subject: RE: Re: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas
> Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>
> It could be fun to play with characters though. It wouldn't be
> a replacement of the Epic rules, but an addition and an optional
> rule. Why should we limit our options? Lots of options are part
> of what makes Epic so great imho.
>
> Rune
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> > Sent: 1. november 2001 14:59
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Sv: Re: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas
> > Sensitivity: Confidential
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I think that to bring back the primarch, phoenix lords and to
> > awaken the Emperor is the wrong way to go. I think it wil
> > take away much of the "epic" feeling of the game to introduce
> > such special and very powerfull characters. If we do this,
> > almost every army will have one or more supercharacters and
> > possible gamebreakers.(I think that even the Squats have some
> > ancient hero that will come back some day!) I think that it
> > should be the privelige of the chaos army to have such characters.
> >
> > To me, epic is about the grunt, the infantryman supported by
> > some stronger units. I fear that this suggestion will turn it
> > other way around, the super characters supported by some fodder.
> >
> > My group has played with some special characters made both by
> > GW and ourself and found that it is far more interesting to
> > play without them.
> >
> > I think that such characters rather belong to WH40K and not
> > to NetEpic.
> >
> > Eivind
> > >
> > > Fra: "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_...>
> > > Dato: 2001/11/01 Thu AM 09:27:10 CET
> > > Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > Emne: Re: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Sort of like Eldar primarchs, eh?
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
> > > To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:19 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The phonix lords are the founders of the Aspect warrior chapters.
> > > >
> > > > Nils
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > > > Sent: 1. november 2001 15:07
> > > > To: netepic_at_...
> > > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > What are the phoenix lords? I'm afraid my knowledge stops
> > around rogue
> > > > trader era fluff.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
> > > > To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:34 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: ext nils.saugen_at_...
> [mailto:nils.saugen_at_...]
> > > > > Sent: 01. November 2001 11:32
> > > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] A few random background ideas
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, the phonix lords should return aswell! What would be
> > > > > their role in
> > > > > this?
> > > > >
> > > > > N
> > > > >
> > > > I'm not exactly an expert on the subject of Eldar. <hint> Maybe you
> > could
> > > > suggest something? </hint>
> > > >
> > > > Jyrki Saari
> > > >
> > > > -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and
> time
> > > is
> > > > money.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Thu Nov 01 2001 - 15:24:18 UTC