Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic 40K revision

From: <deaconblue3_at_...>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:56:51 -0500

Hi!
 
My sentiments exactly. I'd prefer we work, parallel to them, but
separate. We have a different take on this issue and in a funny way we
are more of a target audience for this new game than even those who play
e40k since its "us" Jervis is pitching to get back into the game.
 
Peter

-->I do fully understand this, but some on that list have more of a
working relationship with Jervis and Fanatic than we do. Sometimes the
impact of a suggestion is a result of the source, and not the suggestion
itself. This is a "political" issue of sorts, and needs to be handled as
such to some degree. Remember, we are the heretics who don't "appreciate
E40K's elegant design." So, any suggestion we propose, will be treated
in a different light, no matter how good, or polite. As such, it is
probably in our best interests, as well as Epic's in general, to have
more of a "unified front" than to have the two communities working in
similar, yet separate front.

Josh R

"No matter where you go, there you are." B.Bonzai
Received on Mon Feb 11 2002 - 15:56:51 UTC