Hi!
Thats another thing, Jervis mentioned wanting input, but nothing about playtesting. Which as Darius points out is unlikely. I guess I'm spoiled for being on this list, but you get used to thorough testing and discussion BEFORE it becomes official. Don't know how that will go with this endevour, but their track record isn't promising in this regard.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "darius spano" <dmanspano_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic40k Revision (How)
> I would think most on this list would buy the a new
> verison of E40K (E40K II)game for a few reasons.
> First, new miniatures and scenery sprues. Second, to
> read the rules and see if they are improved and the
> game is playable to their tastes. Lastly, to
> incorporate new ideas into other games they already
> play. I will always play Net Epic I just love the
> game. If I can incorporate a new rule that makes it
> better I will do so. It is kind of like a growinig
> entity (albeit slowly these days).I have been playing
> for 10 years and just learned how to play the
> tyranids. Maybe in the future I will learn the Eldar.
> I am saying it isn't perfect but it is fun and broad
> enough to keep your interest peaked. I highly doubt
> that Jervis will accept our offer of playtesting and
> suggestions. But you can always point out that they
> will sell at least 300 of the new game to members on
> this list, probably closer to 500 with non members
> associated to this list. At $100 a game thats about
> $30000-50000in sales.
> Fantasy Epic? I wanted to see if there is still any
> interest in that anymore? Well, my 2 cents.
> Thanks.
> Darius
> --- Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > You bring up VERY good questions. I guess things are
> > early at this point to what to do, since there
> > remains a lot of unanswered questions. I guess we
> > have to wait and see what Jervis does before we
> > organize ourselves.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "kume1967" <kume1967_at_yahoo.com>
> > To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:42 AM
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Epic40k Revision (How)
> >
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > As far as I see majority of the list wants to
> > involve as a group, and
> > > writing a letter to JJ that we are willing to
> > contribute to the play
> > > testing. This is good but how we gonna play test?
> > Should we made
> > > groups for each army that will play and report the
> > results? How many
> > > of us are really willing to play and report? Or
> > which armies they are
> > > willing to play and with which opponent? Or is it
> > too early to thing
> > > about these?
> > >
> > > I think if we put into the letter that we have x
> > many people and y
> > > armies and can give feedback weekly or biweekly
> > will increase our
> > > chances to contribute, as we will be seen more
> > professional.
> > >
> > > What do you think about this?
> > >
> > > Mete
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
> > netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Tue Feb 12 2002 - 14:10:35 UTC