RE: [NetEpic ML] Regarding Epic40K- Armageddon Playtest

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:27:31 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_caribe.net]
> Sent: 18. February 2002 17:16
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Regarding Epic40K- Armageddon Playtest
>
>
> Hi!
>
> > At this level (with individual vehicles) that is IMO way
> too abstract. When I want that I play a game of Spear Head or
> Modern Spear Head.
>
> But mind you even spearhead has a clear distinction between
> infantry armor and vehicle armor as well as rull for the
> weapons. A german 88 IS different from a british 6 pounder.
> IN the same way I think a lascannon IS different from a battlecannon.
>

I know, but he (and I) was talking about combining of to-hit and penetration rolls, which is done in Spear Head.

As a side note, I'm planning to do a 40k/Modern Spearhead conversion sometime in the future. The MSH system is quite perfect for representing large scale battles. At present the only thing I don't know how to convert are vehicles of larger than superheavy sized.

> Peter
>
>
>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
Received on Mon Feb 18 2002 - 15:27:31 UTC