[NetEpic ML] Re: Netepic, epic40k and Tyranids

From: Brian Evans <brian.a.evans_at_...>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:56:39 -0500

Hmmm..... I wonder what my eldar opponets were doing wrong? Most of the
time the Eldar would make a good showing but they never won. They always
seemed to come up just a little short. Most of their super weapons were
rather unreliable (Warp Cannon thing). They had some good infantry in their
specialty troops, but they were always limited in numbers. Their guardians
were probably one of the worst buys in the game. Their Titans were extremly
vulnerable to template weapons, Squats and Imperial Guard just destroyed
them with Heavy Artillery barrages.

The only unit that I thought was an above average buy were the Falcon grav
tanks. They hit almost all the time and had a -2 save. This really allowed
them to take out tanks and even hurt Titans.

What tactics did your Eldar opponent use that you had trouble with?


----- Original Message -----
From: Weasel Fierce <septimus__at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 2:29 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Netepic, epic40k and Tyranids


>
> >
> >Its no mistake Imperial armies are better than all others, its the GW
way.
> >Look at 40k same deal, the premiere Imperial army and all the other
rejects
> >for target practice.
>
>
> Well, i nsecond edition the eldar was the ruling army due to complete
> unbalance. In 40K3 I would say they have been equalled out.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> et the most popular downloads on the Web. They�re new!
> They�re hot! They're FREE! Utilities, drivers, games.
> It's all here. http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/1610
>
>
>
> -- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
> -- http://www.egroups.com/docvault/netepic/?m=1
>
>
Received on Wed Dec 08 1999 - 04:56:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:48 UTC