And if any unit that want charge a titan (except titans, robot, daemons and
Avatsr) must first do a 5+ roll?
Then IF they charge there are the anti personnel system ecc. ecc.
At 16.52 28/03/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Actually, if you enforce the idea that only a limited number of infantry
>can engage a titan in a given round, then no additional rules are
>needed.
>
>Imperial titans- 6 models
>Eldar titans- 6 models
>Gargants- 12 models
>
>Emperor class titans by definition are immune to infantry.
>
>Peter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Zerloon [mailto:zerloon_at_...]
>Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:02 PM
>To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] More brainstorming
>
>At 21.52 27/03/2002 +0000, you wrote:
>
>
>
> >I still LOATHE the idea of giving a titan basically an immunity
> >against half of an opponants army for free.
>
>Mmmmm a walking skyscrape should be immune to any infantry, save
>exceptionally rare heroes...
>
> >Hell - make them make a moral check to even CHARGE the thing! THAT
> >makes sense... it's all well and good to say that it's possible for
> >infantry to take a titan down, but I certainly woudlnt be running
> >towards one if I saw it on the battlefield.
>
>Well, no much sense...
>Tyranid and Chaos pass automatically morale test...
>Space marine have a 2+...
>Only Eldar (3+) and Ork (4+) have a chance (too low...) of being
>affected
>by morale in charging Titan...
>
>
>Zerloon
>
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>ADVERTISEMENT
><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=217097.1902236.3412362.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705059081:HM/A=999859/R=0/*http://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=29150849&siteid=39282504&bfpage=account>28d4f2.jpg
>28d536.jpg
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Received on Sat Mar 30 2002 - 13:19:30 UTC