RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Deathstrike question

From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:33:53 +0200

Oh no!

We have had this discussion several times before!!! You could say I have
frequent flyer bonus points for useing deathstrike missiles, the rules are
good as they are!!!!

Nils

-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
Sent: 2. april 2002 08:32
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Deathstrike question


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> Sent: 28. March 2001 23:42
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Deathstrike question
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Exactly. I would prefer that the same weapons have the same
> rules. Along
> the lines of my previous suggestions of making all bolter stats the
> same, etc.
>
> Peter
>

Would you really classify a cruise missile and an artillery round to the
same category? They _do_ have a few differences. :)

Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Apr 02 2002 - 06:33:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:33 UTC