Hi!
True, but even simplifying the rules does give it their due, since you
cant shoot down a barrage attack and on the plus side cruise missiles
don't need line of sight when they launch. So if we did the rules to say
"missile moves "x" and then hits target" it has the advantage of no LOS
needed when firing, no to hit needed (it acquires and hits) and it does
so in one turn (advantage of time). On the downside, it can be shot down
and its one shot.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:32 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Deathstrike question
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> Sent: 28. March 2001 23:42
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: Deathstrike question
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Exactly. I would prefer that the same weapons have the same
> rules. Along
> the lines of my previous suggestions of making all bolter stats the
> same, etc.
>
> Peter
>
Would you really classify a cruise missile and an artillery round to the
same category? They _do_ have a few differences. :)
Jyrki Saari
-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is money.
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Mon Apr 02 2001 - 15:36:38 UTC