RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Core Rules [LONG]

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 20:57:37 -0400

Hi!


>Ok, but it's time to introduce some advanced rules about army
>construction, as you already know I've done part (a lot!) of the work
>in this direction...

I mention once before and the group prefers them as optional, so well
place them in that section.
 
>I'll prefer the 25 point increment, but it's just me :P

I know, it seem the majority opinion, I'll behave.
 
>My 2c: NO redundant units.

Why so?
 
>Good rule, should be basic, IMHO. One SM Scout on the objective
>surrounded by 5 Bloodletter isn't really holding anything except his
>breath...

My sentiments exactly.
 
>Need a Walker column, with all infantry privileges except buildings
>that are impassable.

Agreed.

>We can make it a special skill and state its description in the
>relevant codexes... I'm against fill the core rules with too many
>exceptions or rules pertaining a single army or unit...

Agreed.

>*phew*... how many pages there are? :P

A lot.

Peter
Received on Sat Apr 13 2002 - 00:57:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:35 UTC