RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [v5.0] Core Rules Part II

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:42:08 +0300

[snip]
> ----> That sounds interesting; I guess dreadnoughts are more like
> vehicles for pinning, but what about robots? I wonder for
> simplicity we
> should not just keep them in class 4. Also bikes and cavalry are the
> same and in number 4, unless you are arguing that they should be in
> their own category.
>
> Here's a thought:
>
> 1. Titans/Praetorians
> 2. Super Heavy Vehicles/Knights
> 3. All other vehicles
> 4. Dreadnoughts/robots/cavalry/bikes
> 5. Troop Stands
> 6. Skimmers
>
> What do people think about his?
>

I'de still leave cavalry and bikes in the same category as troop stands. Oherwise OK; we've been discussing a long time about making dreads and robots better and this would make them better.

However, this leaves one problem: sentinels and war walkers. Should we classify them as light walkers or something?

[snap]
> Peter
>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
Received on Mon Apr 22 2002 - 09:42:08 UTC