RE: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: Command unit targeting Part III

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:12:45 -0400

Hi!

Hahaha, good one. I guess another point would be how hard should it be
to actually identify and target HQ's. I guess it should be difficult,
but defining difficult is another problem.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Weasel Fierce [mailto:septimus__at_...]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:03 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: Command unit targeting Part III


>This "9" rule means that armies with lots of cheap infantry
>who hit on 5+ will win out. I'd agree that this is a decent
>compromise, if you change it to "roll a 9, then roll a tohit roll
>using the units tohit".
>

This makes the chance of a hit about 1 in 150 or so. Why bother at all
then
?

Just make it impossible or rule that the local McDonalds must be on fire
to
target command units


Weasel



_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Thu Apr 25 2002 - 14:12:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:36 UTC