RE: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:45:14 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext antichrist666it [mailto:seimejote_at_tiscalinet.it]
> Sent: 07. May 2002 12:42
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units
>
>
> --- In netepic_at_y..., <jyrki.saari_at_n...> wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ext antichrist666it [mailto:seimejote_at_t...]
> > > Sent: 07. May 2002 12:29
> > > To: netepic_at_y...
> > > Subject: Re: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In netepic_at_y..., <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> > > > There where also some talk about Cyclone termies. Someone made
> > > stats for them. I dont remember who.
> > >
> > > Gimme the staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaats! :P
> > >
> > > Just substituting the storm bolters with the dread missile
> launcher?
> > > (50cm, 4BP, 5+, -1) cannot combine barrages of course
> > >
> >
> > No barrages; the missiles are more like the normal missile launcher
> missiles. I'd give the launcher the same stats as devastator marine
> weapons with the excetion of better to-hit roll (4+) due to advanced
> guidance system.
>
> You are referring to the 2nd edition W40k or the 3rd?
> Termies with (75cm, 2, 4+, -1) will cost an awful LOT of points...
>
>

We could drop the range to 50cm. However, I don't think it would cost any more than a terminator having a 4BP barrage with a negative save. Remember that barrages affect buildings.

Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
Received on Tue May 07 2002 - 09:45:14 UTC