Jupp!!!! So wopuld termies with missiles!!!! We could Also have flamer
termies and assault cannon termies, but do we really need all these
units?????
N
-----Original Message-----
From: antichrist666it [mailto:seimejote_at_...]
Sent: 7. mai 2002 11:42
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units
--- In netepic_at_y..., <jyrki.saari_at_n...> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext antichrist666it [mailto:seimejote_at_t...]
> > Sent: 07. May 2002 12:29
> > To: netepic_at_y...
> > Subject: Re: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units
> >
> >
> > --- In netepic_at_y..., <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> > > There where also some talk about Cyclone termies. Someone made
> > stats for them. I dont remember who.
> >
> > Gimme the staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaats! :P
> >
> > Just substituting the storm bolters with the dread missile
launcher?
> > (50cm, 4BP, 5+, -1) cannot combine barrages of course
> >
>
> No barrages; the missiles are more like the normal missile launcher
missiles. I'd give the launcher the same stats as devastator marine
weapons with the excetion of better to-hit roll (4+) due to advanced
guidance system.
You are referring to the 2nd edition W40k or the 3rd?
Termies with (75cm, 2, 4+, -1) will cost an awful LOT of points...
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue May 07 2002 - 09:45:24 UTC