Sv: Re: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units

From: <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:25:54 +0200

My comments below...
>
> Fra: "antichrist666it" <seimejote_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/05/07 Tue AM 11:28:50 CEST
> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Emne: Re: Sv: Sv: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] New Imperial units
>
> --- In netepic_at_y..., <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> > There where also some talk about Cyclone termies. Someone made
> stats for them. I dont remember who.
>
> Gimme the staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaats! :P
>
> Just substituting the storm bolters with the dread missile launcher?
> (50cm, 4BP, 5+, -1) cannot combine barrages of course

----------> Sound good to me. The cost would be the same I guess (?)
> >
> > I also made the Crusader available to the termies as a detachment
> card. A termie detachment at the same cost, only switched the Land
> Raider with the Crusader. It would be a nice optional unit if people
> want it. It makes the Termies somewhat more flexible and not quite so
> useless as they are now.
>
> Disagree... why not make them standard transports for Termies of the
> Black Templars chapter? Outside Black Templars there are very few of
> them to justify even a detachment...

---------> I think Jyrki has included them in his forthcomming article in Incomming. The crusaders are in fact very uncommon, but not quite unavailable to other chapters. Guess there wil be a poll on this one.

Eivind
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Tue May 07 2002 - 11:25:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:38 UTC