Hi!
In the end, you may be right, if not single system gains merit (which it
probably won't), a case by case change will have to do....
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimyr [mailto:aallen_at_...]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 6:05 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Core rules polls
Hi Peter,
> Granted, units where the players doesn't have total control like the
> avatar (and chaos androids) should either cost little or nothing,
since
> they may be or use or not at all. Other free cards like jet bikes and
> dire avengers should be paid for.
I myself am just getting back into epic and netepic, but have been
following
these threads for some time (in between reading and re-reading the
netepic
rules), but I must admit, I think that in the case of the free units, as
well as the other units, it would perhaps be better to take them on an
individual basis, rather than lump them together.
In the case of the avatar, he is fairly uncontrollable and gives 2VP
away.
When I played Eldar I rarely took the avatar because of the risk of 2
sometimes easy VP for my opponent. Which I guess seems a fair trade off
for
the free cost.
Other units aren't so black and white. The Eldar units could be easily
left
as free, if you limited them to armies painted in those craftworld
colours.
Sort of a prize for actually painting the army in craftworld colors.
But
then you have the other question which that would bring. What is in it
for
the other armies? Which is lot harder to answer.
Well, that's a big enough ramble for now :)
Mr Flibble
P.S. Peter, I owe you thanks. Your article in Incoming proved to my
wife
that there are people crazier than me.. At least at the moment :)
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Mon May 13 2002 - 22:14:03 UTC