Hi!
Okay, okay boys, let take a breath and calm down. Like I said it's a
moot point. The two camps are firmly entrenched and no ones going to
sway one group or the other. So like I said their will be two price
groups: the current one and the one Jar comes up with. Players choose
which to go with. I'll even make the two sets of cards since I already
have the masters done and it's only a minor text change.
It's been a while since I saw such heated debate, but let's keep it
friendly, no need to get testy over this since it has been resolved
already. Besides everybody loves the game and has their own view and
there's space enough in Net Epic for everyone without to much discord.
Let's return to the revision and let this topic be until everything else
is done.
Back to the revision!
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Lorenzo Canapicchi [mailto:lorenzo.canapicchi_at_...]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:44 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] 5.0 review
jyrki.saari_at_... wrote:
> Obviously, but the bottom line of the statement seemed to me to be:
"Anyone who thinks there's anything wrong with the Eldar and especially
WRH is obviosly a non-expert who shouldn't be messing with things his
superiors are more fit to handle."
I don't know what seemed to you BTW if you don't like the word expert
change it with veteran or what (someone with experience with eldar army)
and the point is that no veteran Eldar general will say that WRH cost is
a
scandal, what any sound veteran eldar general should say is that too
many
WRH could umbalance a match. This is what I know from my experience as a
veteran Eldar general, and yes, if you think WRH is outrageously
underpriced I can only think you don't know Eldar army very well.
>
> You are allowed to speak but let the experts decide?
No i can suggest, i can give my opinion if asked but I know where are my
limits and I know that other people in this list can better judge the
impact of changes in a particular race, 'couse their experience is
larger
than mine, don't know if this seems too strange for you.
>
> Since using the above definition I'm totally unfit to propose any
changes whatsoever to any army, not to mention to be a project leader it
may be best if someone else takes over the Imperial revision. Some
super-expert who eats and breathes Imperium and has been doing so for
the past 20 years. Any takers?
It's up to you, you must judge if you have the numbers and the entusiasm
to be a IG project leader, you also can be aware that someone in your
group
have more "race skills" than you, but you also have to be sure about
your
ability to manage a group to achieve a great work and this hasn't
nothing
to do with experience in playng IG
And no matter how this doesn't have anything to do with that I said
about
to be a veteran player and WRH debate, don't confuse these two things.
--
Lorenzo Canapicchi
TXT e-solutions S.p.A.
Via Frigia 27, 20126 Milano Italy
tel: 02.25771.460
http://www.txt.it
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed May 15 2002 - 12:14:48 UTC