I wouldn't bother to be honest, I don't think it is necessary.
Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_...> on 30/05/2002 16:17:31
Please respond to netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
cc:
Subject: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] AP vs AT
I've been trying to come up with a way to differentiate Anti-Personnel and
Anti-Tank weapons, without changing any game mechanics. How about this:
Call it AP: Weapons with a 0 or -1 TSM
Call it AT: Weapons with -3 or more TSM
Proposal:
Eliminate the -2 TSM bracket. Weapons that are more AP-like drop to -1 TSM
and either add another attack die or get +1 To-Hit. Weapons that are more
AT-like increase their TSM to -3 and either lose an attack die or get -1
To-Hit.
I'll be running some numbers and playtesting this, and if I revamp /
standardize the weapon lists it'll be fairly easy. Opinions?
-Yar
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
*******************************************************
This email has originated from Steria Ltd (formerly Integris Ltd),
Registration No: 2706218.
Privileged, confidential and/or copyright information may be contained in
this email, and is only for the use of the intended addressee. To copy,
forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way if you are not the
intended recipient or responsible for delivering to him/her is prohibited.
If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately,
by using the reply facility in your email software.
We may monitor the content of emails sent and received via our network for
the purposes of ensuring compliance with policies and procedures.
This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationships between Steria Ltd and the recipient.
Office registered at: Computer House, Great West Road, Brentford,
Middlesex, TW8 9DH
******************************************************
Received on Thu May 30 2002 - 15:16:13 UTC