No one is saying 5.A is bad. what we are saying that
there are a lot of changes. From what I can gather the
optional rules will be 100 pages thick and the core
rules 32 pages thick. In the last 2 months or so
revisions have been taking place. How many games of
Net Epic have you thrown down in that time? Me
personally, 1. New rules and units need testing before
they should become even optional not to mention core.I
remember testing and testing for the Slann and that is
now probably one of the most scrutinized armies we
have added to the list (more than 1 group of players
were involved in this endeavour). Someone on the list
said "Keep it simple stupid". Can we improve 4.1's
intellect? Yes, but not from grunt status to general
status. I will read over 5.A when it comes out and I
will probably try it out, but based on the 30+ polls I
have voted in in the last 2 months I am not so sure I
will stick with it.
Darius
--- Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_...> wrote:
> >Happy with 4.0
>
> >i know that i will keep on playing 4.1 -
>
> >I really don't need all the changes we are making
> >to NetEpic Today,
>
> So let me see if I understand - you guys are dumping
> on something you
> haven't even seen yet, on the basis that it couldn't
> possably be better
> than what you've already got. Right? Look - version
> 5.A (the alpha release)
> went to the proofreaders' about half a week ago.
> Wait 'till it gets out and
> you get a chance to read it, ok? *Then* you'll have
> a leg to stand on when
> you say that it's no longer recognizable, and that
> everything's changed,
> and that you'll never play this horrid mutation of a
> rules system, and the
> the editor should be heckled to death.
>
> *pause* Ok, maybe not that last one. *grin*
> -Yar
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
Received on Fri May 31 2002 - 22:35:13 UTC