Re: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] AP vs AT

From: antichrist666it <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 16:51:09 -0000

--- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I understand that Lorenzo, but mostly everything proposed is
optional.
> The only core introductions I can remember are the rules for elite,
the
> terminator save and the building and fortification rules (which
don't
> count since the are AT anyway).
>
> All is good; we're keeping the two editions anyway. Everyone should
play
> the one they like best. There no need to have another "schism", epic
> already has one of those. We can support both editions; we have
evolved
> to the point where "just" one is not enough. Besides, it gives us
more
> to do and talk about.
>
> Peter

I completely agree. Many people are spending a lot of time on this
revision, and I would like to see how this v5.0 will finally be. This
obviously is impossible if we fossilize on the previous things,
because no changes should have been made at all... "Don't fix it if
it ain't broken", remember?

Propose, Playtest and Poll. If it's broken, will be trashed. If it's
good, will be taken.

Proposed units aren't playtested? Ok, playtest them! We are here for
that, after all...

One last thing: what already works for one, may not work for another.
Call me heretic, but I think NetEpic need A LOT of fixes, and may be
A LOT better than the actual v4.1.

Emiliano.
Received on Fri May 31 2002 - 16:51:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:43 UTC