Well,
I don't think the current point costs are wrong, so my suggestion would be
to leave the point cost structure be as it is :)Otherwise the number of
stands in an units and FREE commisars might even out much of the score for
IG. Same goes for the orks, their large numbers compensate for their more
intricate command structure.
On the SM vs Eldar comparison you need to keep in mind that the Eldar
detachments usually have only 4 stands. This is a very important
difference!!!! Thus they should be kept somewhat cheaper! This is probably
why they have the ultra cheap wind rider host in the first place, to balance
out the army. If you where to pay like a 1000 points for it, youd be in
trouble before the game even starts. But this we have been down this path
time and time again and it's a dead end!
Nils
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
Sent: 4. juni 2002 13:38
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Poin Cost
>> First off good effort Jar!
>>
>> However, I believe that you have made the fatal error of comparing
>> units with other units without taking the differences of the armies
>> into consideration.
>>
>> For instance, due to the uniqueness of the armies commandstructure
>> and units size, it is very unlikely that a comparison analasys on
>> unit level between Eldar and IG units will give a fair and balanced
>> result.
>>
>> Nils
I believe I acknowledged this in an earlier post, and asked for help in
correcting it. The Marine and Eldar command structures aren't any different
- there're no restrictions on where a detachment may go. Both Ork and IG
have a restriction, but I didn't know how to account for it so I didn't.
Now that you can see the problem as well, how do you suggest that it be
fixed?
-Yar
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Jun 04 2002 - 12:14:23 UTC