[NetEpic ML] Re: Rules Proposition X - my soapbox response to this thread

From: Weasel Fierce <septimus__at_...>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 07:23:37 GMT

>Infantry don't need and shouldn't get a save. Armored units usually have
>ammo for both hard and soft targets. Now someone could argue that the crew
>might load the wrong ammo and require an intelligence check, or maybe they
>have a finite number of each ammo type and have to keep track of the rounds
>expended. And while we are at it, lets add rules for dud rounds. I am
>rarely sarcastic, ok, I am sarcastic.

well, I still thin kthose f&�king saves ar eneeded. If you compare the
survivability of an infantry stand with the survivability of a tank you will
find that tanks are rather overrated. Actually, AT or heresy does A much
better job at this. Tanks nowadays are ultimate expressions of speed and
firepower but thast armor doesn't keep them alive for a long time.

Therefore, the difference between infantry and tnaks ar eridiculous.
Also, the infantry of the 41st millenium are much tougher than the troops of
our own reality. There got to be a reason why they dont just wear flak

Received on Fri Dec 17 1999 - 07:23:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:49 UTC