Wait a second!!! I thought if this wasn't an optional
rule that already exists but a new one that if it did
not get 66.3% approval it was shot down. I think your
reasoning for making it optional is quite biased.
Stick to the plan man.
Darius
--- Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_...> wrote:
> >POLL QUESTION: Should the ability to transport
> >infantry include the ability to carry
> >Walker-class units (Dreadnaughts,
> >Sentinels, Tinbotz, etc.)?
> >
> >CHOICES AND RESULTS
> >- Yes - they count as one infantry stand., 0 votes,
> 0.00%
> >- Yes - they count as two infantry stands., 12
> votes, 50.00%
> >- No., 12 votes, 50.00%
>
> This poll needs to be consitered in the context of
> the half-dozen transport
> questions put up by Jyrki. Most of those results
> indicate that walkers
> should be allowed to use drop pods, thunderhawks and
> the like. I see two
> options: create a second transport ability that
> works for certain units but
> not others, or put this in as an optional rule. I'm
> lazy and I'd rather
> have you ignore an optional rule than create a new
> one.
>
> Upshot? This goes in as an optional rule.
> -Yar
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
Received on Wed Jun 12 2002 - 01:34:01 UTC