Hi!
Comments below...
>
> Fra: "Millett, George" <George.Millett_at_...>
> Dato: 2002/06/12 Wed PM 12:54:07 CEST
> Til: "'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'" <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Black Templars - new units
>
> Like the analogy but for me it doesn't really fit as regards the Tyranids at
> least.
------->Im sorry... :-) It works for us
>
> For me there are some many different types of Tyranids that each display
> different characteristics and something that will kill one won't necessarily
> kill another more like the various types of golem of were creature. Not to
> mention no one has managed to contain a 'nid organism long enough to run the
> tests required to work out the immunities/weaknesses.
-------> There are obviously different fluff on this. I read a short story where some IG patrolled an area on an African savannah like planet. They had encountered and killed a nid of some kind a week or so ago, and now they returned to the spot. The nid was completely untouched and had not degenrated at all. Normally things would be gone in a day or so in such an environment.
> So the armed forces of the Imperium and others will at best be laden down
> with weapons that they think might work against it this time but can't be
> sure. + Most creatures will regenerate from the smallest piece of untreated
> material give time and a lot of luck.
-------> Why not imagine that the regenerating process is beyond the scope of a normal game? In a campaign it would be an other thing though.
Eivind
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:25 AM
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Black Templars - new units
> >
> >
> > In regards to regenerating creatures with multiple wounds, we
> > have treated it as we do in RPG when fighting trolls. As long
> > as the troll is alive and kicking it can regenerate, but once
> > it is down, any roleplayer know how to keep it dead with fire
> > and acid.
> >
> > Same goes for a game of netepic, as long as the creature is
> > standing, it can regenrate, but if it is turned on its side
> > and there stil are units in base contact in the end phase, it
> > is removed from play.
> >
> > Works quite nice actually.
> >
> > Eivind
> > >
> > > Fra: "Millett, George" <George.Millett_at_...>
> > > Dato: 2002/06/12 Wed AM 11:40:55 CEST
> > > Til: "'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'" <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Black Templars - new units
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: jyrki.saari_at_... [mailto:jyrki.saari@...]
> > > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:32 AM
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Black Templars - new units
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: ext nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
> > > > Sent: 10. June 2002 12:21
> > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Black Templars - new units
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This was an issue in the Slann discussion, and we reached an
> > > > agreement that
> > > > units shouldn't be allowed to regen in cc. This has worekd
> > > > very well, for
> > > > the last year or so!
> > > >
> > > > Nils
> > > >
> > >
> > > There's no mention of it in the Tyranid or Chaos lists. In
> > case of multiple
> > > wound critters this would mean that people would have to
> > keep track of how
> > > the wounds were inflicted in them. Slann or Necrons don't
> > have any such
> > > critters, but Tyranids do. I've yet to see something
> > requiring bookkeeping
> > > to gain any support whatsoever in this list...
> > >
> > >
> > > How about a new rule for the Necrons "I'll be back" or
> > similar that means
> > > they can't regenerate in CC as the power source it ripped
> > out and the
> > > existing regenerate rule that does allow regeneration in CC.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jyrki Saari
> > >
> > > -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes
> > time and time is
> > > money.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > >
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=226014.2032696.3508022.1829184/D=egroup
> web/S=17050590
> >
> 81:HM/A=1000239/R=0/*http://ads.x10.com/?bHlhaG9vaG0xLmRhd=1023701560%3eM=22
> > 6014.2032696.3508022.1829184/D=egroupweb/S=1705059081:HM/A=1000239/R=1>
> >
> >
> >
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=226014.2032696.3508022.1829184/D=egroupmai
> > l/S=1705059081:HM/A=1000239/rand=580032366>
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Wed Jun 12 2002 - 11:21:46 UTC