RE: [NetEpic ML] [v5.0] Blood Angels proposal; forgot something

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:14:16 +0300

[snip]

They still are marines, they still serve the emperor, their love for their battle comrades is still exceptional, they still must observe orders and they sitll MUST OBSERVE UNIT COHERENCY. There's more than a 50% chance that a unit of bikes with overcharged engines get at least one stopped and the whole unit must wait for him. This is not a good marine tactic. Never.

-> Ahem. Bikes aren't vehicles. Only vehicles have overcharged engines.
[snip]

I was referring that improving stats as general method of revision (the so called GW way) will scarcely lead to any good. OK, I see your point, if I don't like I don't use it. But I think that if this tread is going to lead to a point to the game being unplayable, and the most of the players ignoring it, why continue working for this result? I don't want to spent a lot of hours to do sthing I know no one would use.

-> Maybe I do.

I prefer thinking about it and correcting it before it's too late and a lot of effort is wasted.

-> Do you imply that I am not thinking at all? Well, thank you very much. It's very interesting to note one attitude among the listmembers. Namely, "Oh, I do support changes as long as anything doesn't change."

Since we are obviously at the opposite ends of the change axis I don't think there's any point in continuing this discussion. No matter what I say it isn't going to change your mind and no matter what you say it isn't going to change my mind.

The next poll is going to be: Should the new special chapter rules be incorporated to NE5.0? I'll see how it turns up before I post Dark Angels.


Albert


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is money.
Received on Fri Jun 14 2002 - 12:14:16 UTC