Hi!
I forgot one other point. Even if it were decided to have all optional
entries in one book the book could be subdivided into optional army
books and rule books for easy download and printing.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 5:41 PM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Optional book: Yea or Nay?
Hi!
While Jar will use his creative judgment on organizing 5.0 he is aware
of some requests and input from the list in this matter such as complete
summary tables of stats and such at the end of each book.
In order to make is job much easier and to get an organization that is
most effective for everyone involved I am putting up the following poll:
1. All optional rules, new units, etc. will be placed in its own book.
2. List optional rules, new units in the corresponding army/rulebook.
Those who have been us for a while may know that books get a number
designation for which the designation "02" was never used as it was
reserved as an optional book. If that alternative was decided to be the
better one that designation would be used.
The pros and cons will be left to list members to discuss.
Peter
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Sun Jun 16 2002 - 21:46:53 UTC