RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [OT] Warmaster

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:09:45 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_caribe.net]
> Sent: 26 June, 2002 21:09
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [OT] Warmaster
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Okay, I'll bite. WHY is warmaster so great for you. I want details!
>
> Peter
>
>
[snip]

1) The rules were detailed. A bit on the complex side, I admit, but that's just what I like.

2) The UNIT stats were simple. Most of the rules were concerned with game mechanics and NOT unit special rules.

3) At least in the game book itself there were no über characters. The general is usually tough but losing him is catastrophic. Mages/runepriests are useful but hardly game breakers.

That's all I remember; I confess I have (surprise!) not played the game and it has been a while since I read the rules.

Jyrki Saari
Received on Thu Jun 27 2002 - 06:09:45 UTC