I don't think he could start from scratch even if he wanted too.... to be
honest, I feel that there is a hell of a lot of pressure on him to get this
out. The whole development seems rushed. The main this is we DO need to
send some feedback.
Tom.
darius spano <dmanspano_at_...> on 16/07/2002 01:19:22
Please respond to netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
cc: (bcc: Tom Webb/UK/INTEGRIS_EU)
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Epic A: should we say someting?
Hi,
Personally, I thought the rules were changing for the
better. E40K is all about firepower and suppressing
units. I thought Epic A took some of that away and
made it more realistic because close combat was more
deadly and it encouraged more CC and validated troop
stereo-types. I prefer Net Epic to E40k but I thought
Epic A was improving some of E40K. I haven't seen
vehicle rules.
Let Jervis be. He will realize if its a dog or not and
start from scratch or a different angle. The E40K
group should be sending the messege to him not us. We
play our own version of Space Marine and the two games
are very different. How many of us have played E40K?
If so, how many times? I have played it about 4-5
times. The E40K group have played it hundreds of
times. They are better at giving an opinion in that
regard. We can offer ours as well but the strength
behind it is not there. If anything let it play out.
It may surprise us.
On second thought, why not send him an encouraging
email because we do take a lot of ideas for building
armies and troop types from the Fanatic mag. He is
also willing to support an epic scale while most games
released these days are 28mm.
Rambling & Rambling & More Rambling
Darius the "undecided"/the "uncommitted"
--- Kelvin Henderson <kx.henderson_at_...> wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I say that we should send in some sort of response
> from the group. I
> haven't been following Epic:A's development too
> closely, I'll admit, but
> some of what I have heard I like while other things
> seem absurd. The best
> way to get Fanatic's (and hence, Jervis') attention
> is to draft a letter
> from the whole group, noting our membership numbers
> in particular, and send
> it off.
>
> If we really want to have a say in the future of the
> "official" Epic, then
> we do need to say SOMETHING.
>
> -Kelvin....
>
> IMPORTANT. Antidisclaimer. This email is not and
> cannot, by its nature, be
> confidential. En route from me to you, it will pass
> across the public
> Internet, easily readable by any number of system
> administrators along the
> way. If you have received this message by mistake,
> it would be ridiculous
> for me to tell you not to read it or copy it to
> anyone else, because, let's
> face it, if it's a message revealing confidential
> information or that could
> embarrass me intensely, that's precisely what you'll
> do. Who wouldn't?
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
*******************************************************
This email has originated from Steria Ltd (formerly Integris Ltd),
Registration No: 2706218.
Privileged, confidential and/or copyright information may be contained in
this email, and is only for the use of the intended addressee. To copy,
forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way if you are not the
intended recipient or responsible for delivering to him/her is prohibited.
If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately,
by using the reply facility in your email software.
We may monitor the content of emails sent and received via our network for
the purposes of ensuring compliance with policies and procedures.
This message is subject to and does not create or vary any contractual
relationships between Steria Ltd and the recipient.
Office registered at: Computer House, Great West Road, Brentford,
Middlesex, TW8 9DH
******************************************************
Received on Tue Jul 16 2002 - 08:03:27 UTC