[NetEpic ML] Re: Eldar Unicorn

From: AntiChrist <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:13:07 -0000

--- In netepic_at_y..., Zerloon <zerloon_at_i...> wrote:
> At 16.42 21/10/2002 +0000, you wrote:
> >This should finally stop someone using it as an oversized buggy...
> >just because "it's not written on the rules" <groan>.
>
> Well, if in the rules are written that:
> "Also note that this vehicle is not a skimmer and therefore gains
none of
> the skimmer benefits."
> there no space for interpretation...

Yep, my fault. I think this sentence should be removed, the chassis
is that of the Falcon anyway.

>
> >It's amazing how many stupid questions someone have to ask just
> >because it's not written on the rules... though I'm sure "Use your
> >common sense" is surely written somewhere...
>
> 1st: If someone isn't clear or is ambiguos it's my right to ask.

Yes, it's also my point of view.

> 2nd: You could'nt call me "stupid" only if my "common sense" is
different
> from you're...

I've called you stupid somewhere? I'm not talking about you, take it
easy.

> 3rd: Before saying that "someone" use "something" like oversized
buggy, or
> that "how many stupid questions someone have to ask just because
it's not
> written on the rules" please read the army book, and you should
discover
> the sentence I copy/paste before...

Yep, let's talk about Revenant legs, too! ;)

>
> Zerloon
Received on Wed Oct 23 2002 - 09:13:07 UTC