[NetEpic ML] Re: Thoughts on Chaos

From: AntiChrist <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:55:29 -0000

--- In netepic_at_y..., deaconblue3_at_j... wrote:
> Legions have evolved since that time... I don't see Abaddon as
> a "minion" of anyone, not even a Primarch...
>
> -->Oh sure he is. He does their bidding, even if he denies it.
They are
> all pawns, acting on the whims of the four gods. Just because he
thinks
> he's doing it for himself, he isn't.

You sure? I think we are in for a big change in 40k backrgound, but
it's just my sensation...

> The problem is another, however... If I want to field an army
> entirely based on one Traitor Legion (say, a Night Lords army), I
> actually can't.
>
> -->Nor IMO should you be able to outside of the Heresy. Just
because you
> have the models for it, doesn't mean it can happen. If people
carped
> about combining Imperial forces, I can carp about having an army
list
> just for the sake of having an army list for some specific idea.
It's a
> bogus argument, and actually weakens the concept behind NetEpic.
If we
> end up having an army list for everything under the sun, I might as
well
> play E40K or DSII, nice GENERIC rules sets.

Totally disagree. Every now and then, a raid from the eye of terror
is continuely reported by Imperial forces... 4000pts of a CSM army
just represent that.

BTW... still here: GW says "A"? You do "A". If I want the possibility
to do "B", the army list should give me the option.

Another thing: the actual background of w40k is full of holes...
much, much bigger than the eye of terror...

>
> Josh R
>
> "No matter where you go, there you are." B.Bonzai
Received on Fri Nov 22 2002 - 09:55:29 UTC