RE: [NetEpic ML] [5.0]Chaos army list

From: michael presnal <lordthor2001_at_...>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:26:45 -0500

The only way it seems for me is to have at least one GD from each of the chaos gods. I naturally keep the GD's seperate from each other to stop the chance of animosity. I have fought with upwards to 10,000 points, includung demon engines. Without any problems. I do enjoy watching the Pleague Tower assaulting Titians.

>From: "Peter Ramos"
>Reply-To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] [5.0]Chaos army list
>Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:27:01 -0400
>
>Hi!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: deaconblue3_at_... [mailto:deaconblue3@...]
>Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:44 AM
>To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0]Chaos army list
>
>1) Divide CSM from Daemon is right for me, but they should can allies
>each
>others.
>
> >>>This one seems to be a given by now, anyone opposed to this?
>
>-->Yes, but I seem to be the lone voice in the wilderness. I jsut don't
>see this as happening except on the table top. It just doesn't fit the
>fluff. Sorry guys, but it doesn't. A plit in army lists, if at all,
>should be between fights in the Eye, and fights outide of it, nothing
>else.
>
> >>>Well it seems, there are other people who disagree since there is
>more than just one vote against it. Although such a division may be made
>it doesn't preclude adding some units from across lists. It just keeps
>it to manageable levels.
>
>2) Divide Caos between powers is also good, every God with his own
>unique
>troops and the choose of Chaos Undivided
>
> >>>This one too seems favored, anyone opposed?
>
>-->Division among the powers is the only one I see as necessary, period.
>
>It's teh only one that makes sense from a mechanics and fluff view.
>
> >>>It seems we want animosity; problem is what mechanic to use. Zerloon,
>gave me an idea which is a twist on his. The animosity stems from one
>greater demon to another so as Zerloon mentions lets concentrate the
>rule mechanic on that, after all the followers are just that-following!
>They don't have that real reason to hate beyond their greater demon says
>so!
>
>-->This works for me. The tests for animosity revolve around the GD's.
>That way, if a test fails, that GD and his minions charge their "enemy,"
>with out effecting the remaining army bits, and it's all in one roll.
>
>I thought it was simple to, hopefully others will agree too.
>
>Peter
>
>
>
>

MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Received on Sat Nov 23 2002 - 06:26:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:49 UTC