Hi!
I understand that and I suspect that is what the majority will do (mix),
that’s why perhaps accelerating 5.0 with those most interested in it may
be an option.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: christian danckworth [mailto:ce.de_at_...]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 10:28 AM
To: Peter Ramos
Subject: Re[2]: [NetEpic ML] Re: New file uploaded to netepic
Hello Peter,
Monday, January 6, 2003, 3:21:29 PM, you wrote:
hi ,
i think yar is doing a lot of great and hard work,
but the berlin crew still is not sure 100 % if we stay with 4.1 or if
will we use 5.0 -
or perhaps we will mix it ?
dunno yet
best regards
christian
PR> Hi!
PR> These are just templates. Jar puts up prototypes with his own ideas,
but
PR> they get changed when the revisions goes onto that army.
PR> For some time I have been wondering if we should even continue with
this
PR> revision, since I see a group of members have decided not to use it.
PR> Don't get me wrong, there's no anger or resentment in this
statement,
PR> but I wonder if it's not easier to have Jar complete his books and
have
PR> input from those who wish to use it. It's a lot easier for Jar and
me
PR> that way since could finalize books a lot faster.
PR> This way we would offer two versions and let people use whichever
they
PR> prefer.
PR> I would like opinions on this please.
PR> Peter
PR> -----Original Message-----
PR> From: gringo74no <nils.saugen_at_...>
PR> [mailto:nils.saugen_at_...]
PR> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:10 AM
PR> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
PR> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: New file uploaded to netepic
PR> Hey, hey, hey, What is this????
PR> There are som major changes suggested here!!!! These are things that
PR> should have been put to the polls before a complete rule set was put
PR> out!!!! I do not favor this approch to the revision.....
PR> As you all may have noticed, the norwegian connection has withdrawn
a
PR> little from the current discussions since we have decided not to use
PR> NetEpic 5.0. But we keep a vigilant eye on the developement, and I
PR> for one feel I need to rise my voice in concern for this latest
PR> addition. I honestly do not recognice eldar from this list......
PR> Nils
PR> --- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, netepic_at_yahoogroups.com wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This email message is a notification to let you know that
>> a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the netepic
>> group.
>>
>>�� File������� : /Non-image folder/New units and rules/Yar's
PR> Proposals Stuff/07 Eldar Army Book v5B.pdf
>>�� Uploaded by : yar_underwood <jarreas_at_m...>
>>�� Description : New format and some new content, but it still needs
PR> revision.
>>
>> You can access this file at the URL
>>
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/netepic/files/Non-image%20folder/New%
PR> 20units%20and%20rules/Yar%27s%20Proposals%20%26%20Stuff/07%20Eldar%
PR> 20Army%20Book%20v5B.pdf
>>
>> To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit
>>
>> http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> yar_underwood <jarreas_at_m...>
PR> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
PR> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
PR>
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
PR> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
PR> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
PR> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--
christian danckworth
miniature-design
http://www.fantastictool.net
fantastictool
p.o box 55 02 03
10372 berlin
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Mon Jan 06 2003 - 14:43:30 UTC