Re: Core rules Deep Reading (long)

From: AntiChrist <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 10:18:24 -0000

I've always played that transports and carried troops share the same
activation (this permits to embark, move and disembark troops in the
same turn, too).

Even if transports and carried troops belong to different units, they
share the same activation the turn they "interact".

Just my 0.02€.

ALL YOUR TRANSPORTS ARE BELONG TO US.

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "Albert Farr� Benet" <cibernyam_at_h...>
wrote:
> > 2B) Transports and carried units on with the same orders are
still two
> activations.
> >
>
> --> I always understood that carried troops and transports from the
same
> detachment were given only one order counter. Later on it was
admitted the
> possibility to give separate orders to both, but still you could
give only
> one order to the same detachment. Indeed, I always played assuming
that a
> mechanized detachment with only one order counter was activated all
> together, carried units plus transports.
>
> Perhaps we can accept that transports + troops from the same
detachment can
> be activated together if only one order counter is placed for both
(as in
> 2nd ed). I think is fair, your opponent knows that anything inside
the
> transport would have the same orders as it, and you get to deploy
both
> troops and transport at once
>
> Of course, if the transports and the troops are two separate units
(e.g.
> squat berserkers + rhinos) they are forced to have two order
counters and
> thus, be activated separately. This represents the difference
beetwen a
> trained mobile force, really used to operate almost always with
vehicles
> (SM) from another force that occasionaly uses transports (Goff) and
lacks
> that fast coordination beetwen transport and troops (well, in the
end,
> coordination is not *probably* in any Goff dictionary)
>
> Albert
Received on Thu Mar 20 2003 - 10:18:24 UTC